Taking A Position On Brutality
#TITLE#Fighting Is Not The Solution: How We Can Promote Concord#/TITLE# by Bea K. Currier With the evolution of society today, I have to ask: how come hostility is still present? Whenever I picture aggression between individuals, it’s constantly of a couple of Neanderthals waving sticks at each other. Since we possess items that cave dwellers did not, such as devices and abilities to keep ourselves afloat, I don’t get why people want to harm each other. We rely on the same ancient stratagems of our forebears, even though we feel that we are a sophisticated civilization, and we have recourse that our forebears did not possess. So why are people aggressive? It’s my belief that brutality is based in elements such as apprehension and a disconnection from the world. What else would cause one person to objectify another to the point of causing physical harm? If someone loses sight of himself, that’s when he views another individual not as an individual but as a “thing.” That said, there are many people and organizations working to rid the world of violence. Gandhi is just one example of a person who has taken a stance against aggression over time. Currently, there are likely more organizations than ever devoted to decreasing the violence we see around us Executive Success Program by NXIVM. Through the Ethical Humanitarian Foundation and the World Ethical Foundations Consortium, Sara Bronfman has brought to light the issue of reducing instances of aggression in society. She recognizes that there can be more efficient and permanent solutions to the problem of violence, by addressing the issue of ethics. Plenty of associations have taken a stab at decreasing aggression worldwide, but have not succeeded – how come? I think it takes perpetuating a code of ethics, from one person to another. Many organizations offer a transitory solution, or mask the problem, but the root of the issue goes unresolved. If everyone was to stand firm on a basis of principles, what might take place, then? One person and situation would have a deep result on another, and parents would pass that onto their children NXIVM Corporation and Executive Success Programs. I think it is likely for violence to eventually be a thing of the past. It’s my belief that a populace rooted in a sound moral code has that promise. They would not only know how to handle violence in a way that upholds the entire population, but the likelihood of violence resurfacing would be less and less likely to occur. One by one, we can each have a positive impact on our society and the society of our progeny.